BlobBridge vs alternatives

Pick the right approach for surfacing large files to SharePoint users.

Option How it works Pros Cons / Risks Best for
BlobBridge (this product) Mounts an Azure Blob container inside a SharePoint page. SharePoint‑native UX; keep TBs in Blob (low cost); no sync client; fast rollout. Governed by Azure permissions, not SharePoint; requires SAS management; egress charges on heavy downloads. Teams with lots of media/archives needing direct access in SharePoint.
Buy more SharePoint storage Purchase Microsoft 365 SharePoint capacity add‑ons. Zero change to user experience; data stays in Microsoft 365 compliance boundary. Highest monthly cost per GB; not ideal for infrequently accessed or very large files. When budgets are flexible and compliance must stay solely in M365.
OneDrive/Sync to Blob (custom) Keep data in Blob; sync a subset to local + SharePoint shortcuts. Flexible; works for small, curated sets. Operational overhead; user confusion; not scalable for TBs. Small teams with limited scope.
Microsoft 365 Archive Cold‑storage for inactive SharePoint sites/libraries. Very low cost per GB for inactive data. Not for active, in‑place browsing; restore workflows add friction. Compliance archiving where access is rare.
Marketplace alternatives Other SharePoint web‑parts connecting Blob. Variety of features and pricing. Some require storage access keys or subscriptions; ensure security posture meets your standards. When you need a different feature mix or pricing model.

Cost notes